The torment of the world of governance. Observe that ministerial team: each person is confronted with exceptionally challenging portfolios lacking the resources to do what they know is needed.
Their inheritance was even more ruinous than anticipated: they were bequeathed landmines, misleading obstacles and enormous voids. Leaving the European Union is proving to be more economically devastating than predicted, currently costing the exchequer £80bn each year.
They suffer from poor fortune: the Trump administration arrived during their watch. What greater disaster than a corrections official releasing a refused asylum-seeker sex offender? Channel migrants feel unstoppable.
A poorly timed internal party vote at this moment was bound to give Keir Starmer a setback. The eleven percent support at the Caerphilly Senedd special election might not even be their worst performance.
They anticipate brickbats, but they're only human. As often, the Labour MP dares say what all can see: that we're experiencing "deep disillusionment in this country at the moment" and "a growing sense of despair about whether anyone is capable of turning this country round".
Yet, even so, the present hostile state of popular sentiment is perplexing and alarming. The Labour leader is the least popular prime minister on record. Really?
He is a honorable, committed person of noble purposes, without undue arrogance or self-importance. Compare that with Boris Johnson, the short-lived PM, or the breezy presumption of the former Conservative leader, all with so little to justify conceited self-confidence.
However, voters claim, Starmer is worse. As prime minister, he lacks leadership appeal, according to critics: more seriously, he doesn't possess policy adaptability, creative thinking or instinct for where the wind blows.
Labour blundered over cuts for elderly citizens and those with disabilities, offset by generosity elsewhere. Unsure which demographic to target, the party has left beneficial programs unpromoted, from working rights to green investment, new towns and a youth guarantee.
An excessive number of close advisers still think right-wing constituencies needs wooing, when nearly double the number of citizens have moved leftwards since the election was won. Election expert the renowned analyst cautions leadership to cease pursuing populist constituency: they're lost.
The Prime Minister is struggling; this cannot be disputed when pollsters suggest no individual might bounce back from such unprecedented lows.
Yet, during unprecedented territory of remarkable instability, history may be no guide. Starmer pulled Labour from a post-Jeremy Corbyn slough of despond that history said couldn't be turned around in one term.
Would anyone else achieve superior results, or are we experiencing an almost impossible to govern, constantly dissatisfied electorate? Every administration may be dismissed equally quickly following election, despite overwhelming support, only if it appears bearing quick fixes bearing untold bounty for struggling state institutions and financially strained households.
Predictably, panic on the back benches will make discussion about replacing the leader commonplace if the spring local elections go as badly as predicted – or, various commentators argue, earlier.
Here's ministers' paradox: The party's sole opportunity emerges from difficulty. Accept they might be overwhelmed anyway, so employ their parliamentary advantage for four more years to implement their genuine social democratic instinct: introduce significant fiscal adjustments, generating substantial revenue.
Anticipate defeat the next election, so implement all policies immediately. Ignore survey results and voter research; enable the public to witness sincerity in their purpose. The only way to regain public trust is to execute clearly what they consider most right and fair.
Rachel Reeves correctly describes Reform "the single greatest threat" to our way of life. As the Tories effectively combine with Reform, an electoral pact of certain type threatens.
Labour's duty is to do whatever it takes to prevent it. Anticipate alliances, stay suitable for allied groups when party affiliations becomes secondary to the deep red line against an electoral threat unprecedented in modern history.
That's a purpose to defeat discouragement.